Minnesota has often been at the center of national conversations about justice and equity. Now, the state’s Hennepin County Attorney’s Office is facing intense scrutiny after introducing a policy that directs prosecutors to consider race in plea deal negotiations. This move has prompted the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a formal investigation, raising questions across the legal and local communities.
The DOJ recently announced it is examining whether the new policy from Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty crosses legal boundaries. According to FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul, the DOJ will conduct a comprehensive review of all relevant office practices. This investigation focuses on whether considering race during prosecutions illegally impacts decision-making and potentially violates constitutional protections.
The policy aims to address existing racial disparities in the criminal justice system. However, it does not explicitly allow race as grounds for lesser or harsher sentences. Moriarty’s office asserts that the goal is simply to make prosecutors more aware of unconscious biases and disparities, complying with both state and federal laws.
Hennepin County’s memo, shared at the end of April, encouraged prosecutors to take into account a defendant’s background—particularly racial identity and age—when evaluating plea deal options. The intention, as stated by Moriarty, is not to offer different deals solely based on race. Instead, it is to ensure fairer outcomes for all.
Still, legal experts within Minnesota are divided. As CBS Minnesota reports, some legal scholars believe the Supreme Court’s track record indicates extreme caution regarding any policy involving race. Others argue the approach can be constitutionally sound if prosecutors remain focused on addressing disparities without explicit preferences or penalties tied to race.
These policy changes come against a backdrop of significant statistical evidence. A 2023 United States Sentencing Commission report found that Black men in Minnesota received sentences about 13% longer than their white counterparts, while Latino men received sentences over 11% longer. Black and Latino men were also less likely to receive probation, according to the FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul article. For many residents of Minnesota, these figures underscore the importance of examining current prosecutorial policies.
Public reaction in Minnesota has been mixed. Some residents and legal professionals support the policy’s intention to mitigate inequities. Others worry it may conflict with Supreme Court precedent and further complicate plea deal considerations. The DOJ’s investigation is ongoing, with the Civil Rights Division’s Special Litigation Section leading the review. The results will likely shape the future of prosecutorial guidelines in Minnesota and possibly influence broader national standards.
As the DOJ proceeds, the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office has pledged full cooperation. The debate, however, is far from over. It highlights the challenges Minnesota faces in balancing fairness, legality, and the reality of racial disparities within the justice system.
For further reading,
Stay tuned for more as Minnesota navigates this pivotal moment in its legal and social landscape.